Re: Consider low startup cost in add_partial_path

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>, James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Consider low startup cost in add_partial_path
Date: 2026-03-09 13:08:08
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZO96hmEAY+E6Lzh56sOfYwKaftqgvAKq1cEeBbgGZ-Uw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 5, 2026 at 1:17 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I feel like I've done all the due diligence that I can think of here
> to be sure that this is correct and doesn't cause a path explosion or
> plan regressions, so I plan to go ahead and commit this unless there
> are objections RSN.

Committed.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ranier Vilela 2026-03-09 13:16:20 Avoid multiple calls to memcpy (src/backend/access/index/genam.c)
Previous Message Aleksander Alekseev 2026-03-09 13:08:06 Re: [PATCH] Simplify SortSupport implementation for macaddr