Re: trying again to get incremental backup

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: trying again to get incremental backup
Date: 2023-10-19 16:05:35
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZNVeBzoqDL8xvr-nkaepq815jtDR4nJzPew7=3iEuM1g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 4:08 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Clearly there's a good amount of stuff to sort out here, but we've
> still got quite a bit of time left before feature freeze so I'd like
> to have a go at it. Please let me know your thoughts, if you have any.

Apparently, nobody has any thoughts, but here's an updated patch set
anyway. The main change, other than rebasing, is that I did a bunch
more documentation work on the main patch (0005). I'm much happier
with it now, although I expect it may need more adjustments here and
there as outstanding design questions get settled.

After some thought, I think that it should be fine to commit 0001 and
0002 as independent refactoring patches, and I plan to go ahead and do
that pretty soon unless somebody objects.

Thanks,

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
v5-0004-Move-src-bin-pg_verifybackup-parse_manifest.c-int.patch application/octet-stream 4.3 KB
v5-0006-Add-new-pg_walsummary-tool.patch application/octet-stream 11.4 KB
v5-0003-Change-how-a-base-backup-decides-which-files-have.patch application/octet-stream 11.4 KB
v5-0002-Change-struct-tablespaceinfo-s-oid-member-from-ch.patch application/octet-stream 11.7 KB
v5-0005-Prototype-patch-for-incremental-backup.patch application/octet-stream 335.4 KB
v5-0001-Refactor-parse_filename_for_nontemp_relation-to-p.patch application/octet-stream 11.9 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message shihao zhong 2023-10-19 16:05:44 Re: Allow ALTER SYSTEM SET on unrecognized custom GUCs
Previous Message Laurenz Albe 2023-10-19 16:01:40 Re: [PATCH] Add support function for containment operators