| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Julian Markwort <julian(dot)markwort(at)uni-muenster(dot)de>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Valery Popov <v(dot)popov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Subject: | Re: Password identifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol |
| Date: | 2016-07-21 16:19:29 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZMn67CUgUxTD2vFgp7oHWH9qCHRUWebY6OSfSRVG5a_g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 7:42 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> People have, in the past, expressed concerns about linking in
>> pgcrypto. Apparently, in some countries, it's a legal problem.
>
> Do you have any references? I don't see that as a problem.
I don't have a link to previous discussion handy, but I definitely
recall that it's been discussed. I don't think that would mean that
libpgcrypto couldn't depend on libpgcommon, but the reverse direction
would make libpgcrypto essentially mandatory which I don't think is a
direction we want to go for both technical and legal reasons.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-07-21 16:23:09 | Re: One question about transformation ANY Sublinks into joins |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-07-21 16:16:27 | freeze map open item |