Re: "page is not marked all-visible" warning in regression tests

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: "page is not marked all-visible" warning in regression tests
Date: 2012-06-07 13:20:50
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZMGT-+ciRRVkko3iUR0u5F=9waYm97d813z7ZrRmXCmg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Hm. For a short while I thought there would be an issue with heap_delete and
> IOS because the deleting transaction can commit without any barriers happening
> on the IOS side. But that only seems to be possible with non MVCC snapshots
> which are currently not allowed with index only scans.

Well, one, commits are irrelevant; the page ceases to be all-visible
as soon as the delete happens. And two, you can't do a delete or a
commit without a memory barrier - every LWLockAcquire() or
LWLockRelease() is a full barrier, so any operation that requires a
buffer content lock is both preceded and followed by a full barrier.

Proposed patch attached. This adds some more comments in various
places, and implements your suggestion of retesting the visibility-map
bit when we detect a possible mismatch with the page-level bit.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Attachment Content-Type Size
vm-test-cleanup.patch application/octet-stream 4.8 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2012-06-07 13:41:51 Re: "page is not marked all-visible" warning in regression tests
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2012-06-07 13:20:31 Re: Early hint bit setting