| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Ildar Musin <i(dot)musin(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Subject: | Re: using index or check in ALTER TABLE SET NOT NULL |
| Date: | 2019-03-13 17:25:11 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZMDn_9xHBeJVSsgLrRpDk85y_Gp=ccts9x1CHaSb3DKA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 1:19 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Oh, and yes, I think QueuePartitionConstraintValidation's usage
> is an unacceptable abuse of INFO level. I'm surprised we haven't
> gotten complaints about it yet.
Perhaps that's because users aren't as direly opposed to informational
messages from DDL commands as you seem to believe...
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2019-03-13 17:27:08 | Re: hyrax vs. RelationBuildPartitionDesc |
| Previous Message | Fabien COELHO | 2019-03-13 17:25:08 | Re: Timeout parameters |