| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Questionable tag usage |
| Date: | 2017-01-10 15:54:21 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZM9EPfsNtBcSjY2RD4Ys3t0uTXtzFDDuME7_-XWH1UpA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> I don't think there are a lto of people who use dead tree editions anymore,
>> but they certainly do exist. A lot of people use the PDFs though,
>> particularly for offline reading or loading them in ebook readers. So it
>> still has to be workable there.
>
> PDFs do have hyperlinks, so that in itself isn't an argument for keeping
> the dead-tree-friendly approach. However, I've noticed some variation
> among tools in whether a PDF hyperlink is visibly distinct, or whether
> you have to mouse over it to find out that it would take you somewhere.
> Not sure if that's enough of a usability fail to argue for keeping the
> old way.
Personally, I wouldn't sweat it.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-01-10 15:58:08 | Re: [HACKERS] Questionable tag usage |
| Previous Message | jitendravarshney392 | 2017-01-10 12:44:29 | idx function is not working |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-01-10 15:55:15 | Re: RustgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-01-10 15:39:58 | Re: pageinspect: Hash index support |