Re: incorrect libpq comment

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 01:16:28PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> Bruce's commit 5d305d86bd917723f09ab4f15c075d90586a210a back in April
>> of 2014 includes this change:
>>
>> /* See PQconnectPoll() for how we use 'int' and not 'pgsocket'. */
>> - int sock; /* Unix FD for socket, -1 if not connected */
>> + pgsocket sock; /* FD for socket, PGINVALID_SOCKET if
>> unconnected */
>>
>> I suppose Bruce must have overlooked the fact that the comment on the
>> previous line is now false. I think we should remove it, because it
>> makes no sense to say how we are using 'int' rather than 'pgsocket'
>> when in fact we are not using 'int' any more.
>
> Agreed.

Great. Nuked it.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company