| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tels <nospam-pg-abuse(at)bloodgate(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Translations contributions urgently needed |
| Date: | 2018-02-24 13:43:15 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZLSn5DF=e9EYvK-Pey2118tMUmy-=jeSxd9GWghmMDEA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 9:15 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Clearly, for a few languages the current facilities are sufficient.
> If we make the process easier, we're likely to have more translations.
> Will there be people verifying the quality also?
It seems to me that making the process easier has got to be a net
positive. It's possible that some language which otherwise would have
had no translation at all will end up with a bad one, but it's equally
possible that some language which would otherwise have had a bad one
will end up with a good one.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2018-02-24 14:08:07 | Re: [HACKERS] WIP: Aggregation push-down |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-02-24 12:37:51 | Re: check error messages in SSL tests |