Re: pg_plan_advice

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jakub Wartak <jakub(dot)wartak(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Dian Fay <di(at)nmfay(dot)com>, Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_plan_advice
Date: 2026-01-12 13:10:00
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZKqhexEaRr4RXKp=kQstXOKaZbkTtYUCb6GRPABFS14w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jan 9, 2026 at 8:53 AM Jakub Wartak
<jakub(dot)wartak(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> The only thing this hav revealed is what appears to be some tiny
> problem with placing GroupAggregates or am I wrong or is that known
> limitation? (The original plan shows "Partial GroupAggregate" while
> the one using advice is not aware of the need to use it; yet
> contrib/pg_plan_advices/README in "Future Work" indicates it is out of
> scope for now, right?)

This is great news -- and yes, that's out of scope for now.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Borisov 2026-01-12 13:24:37 Re: Improve the performance of Unicode Normalization Forms.
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2026-01-12 12:25:32 Re: PL/Python initialization cleanup