| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Old postgresql repository |
| Date: | 2011-07-06 15:59:09 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZKN2C7_Ro8bXNGy7KAv+JXmZoFnMa4BVnwbAbAXq6ORQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> When we did the migration to git, we decided to leave the old
> postgresql git repository around "for a while", for people who had
> clones around it. This is the repository that was live updated from
> cvs while we were using cvs, and does *not* correspond to the current
> git repository when it comes to hashes and other details. It's
> available at http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=postgresql-old.git;a=summary
>
> I think it's time to drop this repository now. Anybody who had active
> clones on it should've moved to the new repository by now, I think.
>
> Comments?
OK by me. Thanks for holding off.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2011-07-06 16:22:13 | Re: Range Types, constructors, and the type system |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-07-06 15:58:19 | Re: Review: psql include file using relative path |