Re: Creation of wiki page for open items of v11

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Creation of wiki page for open items of v11
Date: 2018-04-11 15:17:39
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZGSUbfy33mQdsVy7aWKnjAYXw5AakbjWEU-ppOODtHtA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 10:53 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 6:53 PM, Peter Eisentraut
>> <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Do people find it useful to move the resolved items to a separate
>>> section on the page, instead of just removing them? I'm not sure that
>>> the resolved sections are useful, compared to just using the git log.
>
>> If we have a section for resolved items, we can keep track of all
>> items. If we just delete the resolved items, we wouldn't know if it
>> was a mistake or it was intentional removal.
>
> It's not that much work to move the items rather than remove them,
> so I'd vote for keeping up the practice. It has some value in terms
> of tracking activity.
>
> What *does* take time is adding a link to the commit, so I'd happily
> drop that step. As Peter says, you can usually look in the commit
> log if you care.

The trouble is that sometimes it's not very obvious which commit log
entry relates to which open item.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chapman Flack 2018-04-11 15:27:19 Re: lazy detoasting
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-04-11 14:59:45 Re: 'make check' fails