Re: progress report for ANALYZE

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tatsuro Yamada <tatsuro(dot)yamada(dot)tf(at)nttcom(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: progress report for ANALYZE
Date: 2019-07-10 13:23:19
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZEJYe2rhC6kG4vdRTwOFPMKv9V0+PCgb2jSaw7vgP6GA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 6:12 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Hmm, ok. In CREATE INDEX, we use the block counters multiple times.

Why do we do that?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2019-07-10 13:26:28 Re: progress report for ANALYZE
Previous Message Robert Haas 2019-07-10 13:11:28 Re: let's make the list of reportable GUCs configurable (was Re: Add %r substitution for psql prompts to show recovery status)