| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Parallel seq. plan is not coming against inheritance or partition table |
| Date: | 2017-03-14 18:41:41 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZDmTFZu4iZgX43vJU8WCUnd9L9TU8Bavdi0W_0iGN8UQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Agreed, so I have rebased your patch and passed heap_pages as -1 for
> index_only scans as discussed. Also, Rafia has tested with attached
> patch that parallel index and parallel index only scans are picked for
> TPC-H queries. I have also reviewed and tested your changes with
> respect to problem reported and found that it works as expected. So,
> I think we can go ahead with attached patch unless you see some
> problem with the changes I have made.
OK, committed with a little more wordsmithing.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-03-14 18:47:37 | Re: logical replication access control patches |
| Previous Message | Petr Jelinek | 2017-03-14 18:41:28 | Re: logical replication access control patches |