Re: Policy on pulling in code from other projects?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Policy on pulling in code from other projects?
Date: 2011-07-22 18:21:53
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZCc9tfypMNvpVz0kuGuz__nDo0OvfgHQkzFFyE-NjpWw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> I am not neccessarily looking to include it in our tarball. What I asked
> was:
>
> Assuming the code actually makes this patch easier, do we:
>
> A. Pull in the code into the main tree
> B. Instead have it as a requirement via configure?

Well, both ways are going to cause a certain number of problems.
Pulling it into the tree means we've got to maintain it forever;
requiring it via configure means that everyone who packages PostgreSQL
now has to include that library if they want to include PostgreSQL.

> I am not arguing one way or the other. I am trying to find the best
> solution. I personally think you are handwaving if you think we can build
> out a robust parser in a couple of hours.

I respect your opinion, but, in this case, I disagree.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2011-07-22 18:22:09 Re: Policy on pulling in code from other projects?
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2011-07-22 18:09:26 Re: Policy on pulling in code from other projects?