Re: incremental backup issue

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
Cc: Nick Ivanov <nick(dot)ivanov(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: incremental backup issue
Date: 2026-07-22 13:12:32
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZCKnC+O1wa2ZWgtQc0uQsJO35AHOzvzcmVb_joj8bxWA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 5:42 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I attach a patch. I don't think we need anything like the 0002 in your
> proposal from claude. The read horizon used by the WAL summarizer
> *has* to be valid; if we can't achieve that, we're doomed.

I have now committed this patch and back-patched to back to v17, the
first release that contains walsummarizer.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2026-07-22 13:18:30 Re: [PATCH] Fix memory leak in pg_config
Previous Message Christoph Berg 2026-07-22 13:12:26 Re: Allow pg_read_all_stats to see database size in \l+