| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>, Amit Langote <langote_amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: ATTACH/DETACH PARTITION CONCURRENTLY |
| Date: | 2018-12-18 18:41:06 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZB885xzc0M87w30KbYU7osX9Vfso7f5FeZEiPE7wbazw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 6:44 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> Agreed. This patch has value, and somebody else could always take it
> from the point where you were.
OK. I'll post what I have by the end of the week.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2018-12-18 18:46:59 | Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order (regressions in DROP diagnostic messages) |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2018-12-18 18:34:17 | Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order (regressions in DROP diagnostic messages) |