Re: Log LDAP "diagnostic messages"?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Log LDAP "diagnostic messages"?
Date: 2017-09-14 16:38:57
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZ8Bv83_ZVc9hbPOJOukcRqWRF46eADuDtcz6U82gBVyA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> BTW I added --with-ldap and --with-pam to the configure line for the
> reports in coverage.postgresql.org and the % covered in auth.c went from
> 24% to 18.9% (from very bad to terribly sad).

Improved code coverage is becoming a fad.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jesper Pedersen 2017-09-14 16:53:12 Re: [POC] hash partitioning
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-09-14 16:37:00 Re: expanding inheritance in partition bound order