Re: PG 10 release notes

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG 10 release notes
Date: 2017-05-01 12:40:07
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZ7+NdYAo07cLz25PmvCj0=C05UdPT+kbo_PWmrcS2DjQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 9:56 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> First, I don't think RFC references belong in the release notes, let
> alone RFC links.

Why not? I think RFC references are a great thing to include in the
release notes, and including links seems helpful, too.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-05-01 12:46:47 Re: snapbuild woes
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-05-01 12:30:37 Re: Declarative partitioning - another take