Re: commitfest 2016-11 status summary

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: commitfest 2016-11 status summary
Date: 2016-12-05 21:27:07
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZ6Pf8Em5Hza5nMUuhjQe7xyEEe5kkrUndoke8jr8PWHw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 12:50 AM, Haribabu Kommi
<kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Moved to next CF with needs review.
> 1. patch doesn't receive any full review in the commitfest
> 2. Patch received feedback at the end of commitfest.

The number of patches that got this treatment seems quite large. If
the people who are submitting patches are also reviewing other patches
of comparable difficulty, this really shouldn't be happening.
Something isn't working well, here.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2016-12-05 21:42:39 Re: Typmod associated with multi-row VALUES constructs
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-12-05 21:22:44 Re: Typmod associated with multi-row VALUES constructs