Re: psql: bogus descriptions displayed by \d+

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: psql: bogus descriptions displayed by \d+
Date: 2011-08-04 18:43:41
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZ5cPBi=hrev9m=7f7=gAQGgvkfEdMehVb=BcVRwX+6Jw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> On ons, 2011-07-27 at 18:08 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> Also, while it may be true that we haven't used the term specifically
>> in SQL sypnoses, it's been extensively used in other parts of the
>> documentation, in the names of system functions such as
>> pg_relation_size(),
>
> Well, that thing is just the pinnacle of silliness, because we have
> pg_relation_size() and pg_table_size(), which have confusingly different
> behaviors.

Yeah, I just got flummoxed by that yesterday. Still, the name's out there...

>>  and in user-visible error messages (cd
>> src/backend/po; git grep relation), so I think you may be trying to
>> close the barn door after the horse has got out.
>
> No, I'm trying to catch the horse. ;-)

Fair enough, but I think you're not running fast enough (yet).

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-08-04 18:59:11 Re: psql: bogus descriptions displayed by \d+
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2011-08-04 18:30:56 Re: psql: bogus descriptions displayed by \d+