Re: pg_prewarm really needs some CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_prewarm really needs some CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS
Date: 2014-11-11 13:11:48
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZ5YfmGzO_HrYmh5oG1MioyKb57dd_vV=G4Nx8vsuf4=w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> pg_prewarm() currently can't be cannot be interrupted - which seems odd
> given that it's intended to read large amounts of data from disk. A
> rather slow process.

Oops.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2014-11-11 13:13:45 Re: BRIN indexes - TRAP: BadArgument
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2014-11-11 13:04:03 Re: BRIN indexes - TRAP: BadArgument