| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Clough <greg(dot)clough(at)ipreo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Enhancement Idea - Expose the active value of a parameter in pg_settings |
| Date: | 2018-05-25 16:18:29 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZ4mV0b2O76PbJCZ4ko7oV5puFz49KvVE4FFc0CoyvDtg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 12:14 PM, Greg Clough <greg(dot)clough(at)ipreo(dot)com> wrote:
> Many thanks for the quick consideration, even if it's ultimately a rejection. Figuring out some SQL that will work across all platforms, versions, and compile-time options will be "fun", but I'm up for a challenge.
Why would you need different SQL for this on different platforms or
with different compile-time options?
I agree that there could be some variation across major versions, but
I don't think there's a lot.
BTW, posting to a public mailing list with a giant blob of legalese
about confidential information in your signature is kind of silly.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Reiss | 2018-05-25 16:53:17 | Re: Performance regression with PostgreSQL 11 and partitioning |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-05-25 16:16:41 | We still claim "cannot begin/end transactions in PL/pgSQL" |