Re: Additional role attributes && superuser review

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Adam Brightwell <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Additional role attributes && superuser review
Date: 2015-01-26 18:31:07
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZ4P6Hf7GO8w0=_ZB7f2UmTYYNBGQ28QhYNdOCSBZBQpA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Adam Brightwell
<adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com> wrote:
> After re-reading through this thread is seems like EXCLUSIVEBACKUP (proposed
> by Magnus) seemed to be a potentially acceptable alternative.

So this would let you do pg_start_backup() and pg_stop_backup(), but
it wouldn't let you run pg_basebackup against the server?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2015-01-26 18:34:34 Re: Proposal: knowing detail of config files via SQL
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-01-26 18:12:32 Re: longjmp clobber warnings are utterly broken in modern gcc