Re: Event Triggers reduced, v1

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Event Triggers reduced, v1
Date: 2012-06-20 19:51:26
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZ2gcRJ+8n5ki163VBHzrrxPB4R-UUTeanop-LLH=pz=A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 20, 2012 09:33:26 PM Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
>> > Hmm, I don't like the idea of a test that only runs in serial mode.
>> > Maybe we can find some way to make it work in parallel mode as well.
>>
>> I don't see how we can manage to do that, as adding an event trigger to
>> some command will impact tests running in parallel.
> Cant you just put it alone in a test group in the parallel_schedule? Several
> other tests do that?

Yeah, that seems like it should work. If not, I'd say the tests
themselves are broken.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2012-06-20 19:53:43 Re: pg_prewarm
Previous Message Andres Freund 2012-06-20 19:49:23 Re: [PATCH 10/16] Introduce the concept that wal has a 'origin' node