| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: 9.6 TAP tests and extensions |
| Date: | 2016-10-26 16:42:46 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZ2ShT38LwKXj0YJ0T3yqEBHw6JhtwoYPqH2rTc0VjLBg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 7:17 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> On 2016-09-23 16:04:32 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Looking back over the thread, I see that you also proposed installing
>> isolationtester and pg_isolation_regress for the benefit of extensions.
>> I'm very much less excited about that idea. It'd be substantially more
>> dead weight in typical installations, and I'm not sure that it'd be useful
>> to common extensions, and I'm not eager to treat isolationtester's API
>> and behavior as something we need to hold stable for extension use.
>
> FWIW, I'd be quite happy if it were installed. Running isolationtester
> when compiling extensions against distribution postgres packages would
> be quite useful.
+1.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-10-26 17:01:35 | Re: what to do about unsupported encodings |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-10-26 16:38:15 | Re: Rename max_parallel_degree? |