| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | 曾文旌 <wenjing(dot)zwj(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Hamid Akhtar <hamid(dot)akhtar(at)gmail(dot)com>, "heikki(dot)linnakangas" <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)iki(dot)fi>, "Nasby, Jim" <nasbyj(at)amazon(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal: Global Index |
| Date: | 2021-01-07 15:04:54 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZ2-BR79xXpY2JTe++B0XNuFvveDA_BUJjKdZcLYD33iA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 4:44 AM 曾文旌 <wenjing(dot)zwj(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com> wrote:
> I've been following this topic for a long time. It's been a year since the last response.
> It was clear that our customers wanted this feature as well, and a large number of them mentioned it.
>
> So, I wish the whole feature to mature as soon as possible.
> I summarized the scheme mentioned in the email and completed the POC patch(base on PG_13).
You need to summarize the basic design choices you've made here. Like,
what did you do about the fact that TIDs have to be 6 bytes?
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2021-01-07 15:25:58 | Re: Online checksums patch - once again |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2021-01-07 15:02:14 | Re: Key management with tests |