Re: broken documentation: BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnection(NULL, NULL);

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: broken documentation: BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnection(NULL, NULL);
Date: 2015-05-15 19:54:32
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZ1ngjs7j_5kg+bxVaJx1MRmCpF5EUqijUoWsFdFzhT3A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 8:25 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> The documentation (or this feature) is broken still
>>
>> If dbname is NULL or dboid is InvalidOid, the session is not connected to
>> any particular database, but shared catalogs can be accessed. If username is
>> NULL or useroid is InvalidOid, the process will run as the superuser created
>> during initdb. A background worker can only call one of these two functions,
>> and only once. It is not possible to switch databases.
>>
>> But it fails with error:
>>
>> FATAL: database 0 does not exist
>
> Ugh. I think that's a bug.
>
> Patch attached.
>
> The test code I used to verify that this works is also attached.
>
> If there are no objections, I will commit and back-patch.

Oops. Really attached this time.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Attachment Content-Type Size
no-db-worker.patch application/x-patch 1.1 KB
contrib-no-db-worker.patch application/x-patch 4.5 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2015-05-15 19:56:47 Re: Patch for bug #12845 (GB18030 encoding)
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-05-15 19:53:50 Re: broken documentation: BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnection(NULL, NULL);