Re: Aggregate Push Down - Performing aggregation on foreign server

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jeevan Chalke <jeevan(dot)chalke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Aggregate Push Down - Performing aggregation on foreign server
Date: 2016-10-21 15:12:43
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZ0pHe2a=iBjtammnMWiVtKHm2Gtm0aqWffpzsg4TN+qQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> I didn't find anything structurally wrong with this patch, so I've
>> committed it with many cosmetic changes. Judging by what happened
>> with join pushdown, there are probably some residual bugs, but
>> hopefully not too many.
>
> dromedary seems to have found one, or at least an unstable test result.

OK, looking at that now. Thanks.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Nasby 2016-10-21 15:15:21 Re: Fun fact about autovacuum and orphan temp tables
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2016-10-21 15:03:00 Re: Default setting for autovacuum_freeze_max_age