Re: Parallel worker hangs while handling errors.

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallel worker hangs while handling errors.
Date: 2020-09-08 11:54:37
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZ-T32DutyKfzoDwM=M5rXQJBGqFxE3Ud+MRozM34F=DA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 5:29 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Concretely, something about like this (I just did the bgwriter, but
> we'd want the same in all the background processes). I tried to
> respond to Robert's complaint about the inaccurate comment just above
> sigsetjmp, too.
>
> This passes check-world, for what little that's worth.

Seems totally reasonable from here.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Bapat 2020-09-08 11:59:47 Re: Evaluate expression at planning time for two more cases
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2020-09-08 11:48:16 Re: Global snapshots