Re: [POC] A better way to expand hash indexes.

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Mithun Cy <mithun(dot)cy(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [POC] A better way to expand hash indexes.
Date: 2017-04-04 03:48:40
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZ=VPt5AhsD=_3674Mqdqbk4LcVQTBp2UoqT1sirqVAww@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 3:29 AM, Mithun Cy <mithun(dot)cy(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Mithun Cy <mithun(dot)cy(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>> Also adding a patch which implements the 2nd way.
> Sorry, I forgot to add sortbuild_hash patch, which also needs similar
> changes for the hash_mask.

Committed.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2017-04-04 03:52:57 Re: Refactoring identifier checks to consistently use strcmp
Previous Message Ashutosh Bapat 2017-04-04 03:43:31 Re: Unable to build doc on latest head