Re: Revert RI fast-path batching from REL_19_STABLE

On Wed, Sep 9, 2026 at 11:41 AM Melanie Plageman
<melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2026 at 8:26 AM Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > That still leaves your concern about whether the per-row path is
> > sufficiently solid for v19. The snapshot fixes and Amit's recent
> > collation report show that there are differences from SPI that we (I)
> > missed. The proposed collation fix falls back to SPI when the
> > referenced index and column collations differ. I still propose
> > retaining the per-row path, but agree that its readiness needs to be
> > assessed separately from the decision to remove batching.
>
> I think a good start would be to revert the batching ASAP so that we
> can consider the state after independently.

+1.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com