Re: varlena beyond 1GB and matrix

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PgHacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: varlena beyond 1GB and matrix
Date: 2016-12-22 23:24:10
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZ+pgMCNxzMf5zTYB0hF7OVKFXF7H1_CNRZ5Qi6gG8a0g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 11:01 PM, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> wrote:
> Regardless of the ExpandedObject, does the flatten format need to
> contain fully flatten data chunks?

I suspect it does, and I think that's why this isn't going to get very
far without a super-varlena format.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-12-22 23:35:01 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Build HTML documentation using XSLT stylesheets by default
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-12-22 23:23:26 Re: varlena beyond 1GB and matrix