Re: Command Triggers

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Command Triggers
Date: 2012-03-21 16:40:57
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYwhrwLU7oO5W56xU_goFSuNd0VfYKXz1z=0Rs+HPRSgQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 21, 2012 04:54:00 PM Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>> > The attached patch applies from 8.3 to 9.1 (8.2 has conflicts but
>> > thankfully...).
>>
>> It seems it doesn't apply to master (any more?).
> Its not required there because of the unification of CTAS with normal code.
> Sorry, that was only clear from a few mails away, should have made that
> explicit.

Or maybe I should have tested it before jumping to conclusions.

Anyway, I've committed the patch to 9.1, 9.0, 8.4, and 8.3.

Thanks,

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alex Shulgin 2012-03-21 16:42:58 Trivial libpq refactoring patch (was: Re: Another review of URI for libpq, v7 submission)
Previous Message Robert Haas 2012-03-21 16:15:17 Re: Weak-memory specific problem in ResetLatch/WaitLatch (follow-up analysis)