Re: Documentation fixes for pg_visibility

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Documentation fixes for pg_visibility
Date: 2016-06-27 21:57:29
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYvroXPe2YMAvL_wOs4uuBwG=G2ZO6+1f-ZbFEfOMNdwQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 12:46 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> While looking at the module I found two mistakes in the docs:
>> pg_visibility_map and pg_visibility *not* taking in input a block
>> number are SRFs, and return a set of records. The documentation is
>> just listing them with "returns record". A patch is attached.
>
> And that: s/PD_ALL_VISIBILE/PD_ALL_VISIBLE.

Committed. Thanks for the careful proofreading.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-06-27 22:04:23 Re: fixing consider_parallel for upper planner rels
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2016-06-27 21:56:43 Re: Documentation fixes for pg_visibility