| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Ildus Kurbangaliev <i(dot)kurbangaliev(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Custom compression methods |
| Date: | 2020-11-24 18:38:09 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYuuLKVPnN0jv6vqe=DepzMBA3_i1qxe9NsqT1ypiDNuw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 1:21 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> FWIW, I kind of agree with Robert's take on this. Heap and index AMs
> are pretty fundamentally different animals, yet we don't have a problem
> sticking them in the same catalog. I think anything that is related to
> storage access could reasonably go into that catalog, rather than
> inventing a new one.
It's good to have your opinion on this since I wasn't totally sure
what was best, but for the record, I can't take credit. Looks like it
was Álvaro's suggestion originally:
http://postgr.es/m/20171130205155.7mgq2cuqv6zxi25a@alvherre.pgsql
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alexey Kondratov | 2020-11-24 18:43:01 | Re: [PATCH] postgres_fdw connection caching - cause remote sessions linger till the local session exit |
| Previous Message | David Zhang | 2020-11-24 18:36:33 | Re: BUG #16663: DROP INDEX did not free up disk space: idle connection hold file marked as deleted |