From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Amit Khandekar <amit(dot)khandekar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Assertions in PL/PgSQL |
Date: | 2013-11-19 16:18:17 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYuOt72Y7rT=k0-_eU6q=0+dDs3FfQtLesvh3FS3nQTpg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Now that having been said, I'm a bit wary of adding every new frammish
>> someone suggests to PL/pgsql. Many of the things we've added recently
>> are things I anticipate that I'll never use.
>
> lot of features are popular with some delay. CTE is very popular now, and
> two years ago only few developers used it. Lot of applications are developed
> for 9.1 still.
I think that's true, but not particularly relevant. CTEs are
obviously a major feature; a lot of the stuff we've been adding to
PL/pgsql is tinkering around the edges.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2013-11-19 16:26:34 | Re: Changing pg_dump default file format |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2013-11-19 16:16:53 | Re: Changing pg_dump default file format |