Re: [v9.2] Fix leaky-view problem, part 1

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kohei Kaigai <Kohei(dot)Kaigai(at)emea(dot)nec(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [v9.2] Fix leaky-view problem, part 1
Date: 2011-07-07 17:15:53
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYtx2zLmg8NA4zKdeZ_ppyAzpntuZkf0xUkyCTK=ODiAQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> wrote:
> My opinion is ALTER TABLE SET/RESET code should be enhanced to accept
> an operation to reset all the existing options, rather than tricky
> updates of pg_class.
> How about an idea to add AT_ResetAllRelOptions for internal use only?
>
> I'll fix up the regression test also.

On an only semi-related note, ISTM that you may as well merge parts 0,
1, and 2 into a single patch, since there is no way we are going to
apply any of them without the others. I suggest closing one of the
CommitFest entries and revising the other one to point to the
consolidated patch.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-07-07 17:26:10 Re: Inconsistency between postgresql.conf and docs
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2011-07-07 16:50:16 Re: Moving the community git server