Re: Flushing large data immediately in pqcomm

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Melih Mutlu <m(dot)melihmutlu(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Flushing large data immediately in pqcomm
Date: 2024-03-14 12:12:36
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYr+ThbKThynszV1UyosewyvUF8vqY-vKeSPGXCbgoniQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 7:22 AM Melih Mutlu <m(dot)melihmutlu(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> 1- Even though I expect both the patch and HEAD behave similarly in case of small data (case 1: 100 bytes), the patch runs slightly slower than HEAD.

I wonder why this happens. It seems like maybe something that could be fixed.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2024-03-14 12:21:29 Re: small_cleanups around login event triggers
Previous Message Étienne BERSAC 2024-03-14 12:09:37 REVOKE FROM warning on grantor