Re: incorrect docs for pgbench / skipped transactions

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: incorrect docs for pgbench / skipped transactions
Date: 2016-03-29 18:09:17
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYqc1E+twcfLHNgKCmQLx1-jtmU7wSq+w98BO98DMOxmw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> wrote:
>>> Ok, I added a reference to the commitfest entry from this wiki page, and
>>> a
>>> note about partial 9.5 backporting.
>>
>> Please split the patch into one part for backporting and one part for
>> master-only and post both patches, clearly indicating which is which.
>
> Attached are the full patch for head and the backport part (the patch name
> ends with "backport") separated.

That's not really what I wanted; the full page includes the stuff for
back-porting, whereas I wanted two independent patches.

I wordsmithed your version of Tomas's patch and pushed that to 9.5 and
master, and I pushed the first hunk of your full patch to master also.
I think the last hunk of that is overkill, so I did not push that.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2016-03-29 18:09:41 Re: Updated backup APIs for non-exclusive backups
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2016-03-29 17:58:17 Re: pgbench stats per script & other stuff