Re: pg_dump: CREATE TABLE + CREATE RULE vs. relreplident

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump: CREATE TABLE + CREATE RULE vs. relreplident
Date: 2015-03-12 16:58:55
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYpMmB5XHfdcqXjdjNRcux-soXwTdxkX4-L+ZrnojN5tQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> As it happens it does not; the issue came up originally because of a
>> hack I came up with, and I've never used any pg version so old it didn't
>> have CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW. Nor does it look like the change was ever
>> backpatched (or at least not that far).
>
> Sorry, that's mere historical revisionism.

Can we please keep this a little more civil? Saying it that way
implies bad faith. You could instead write "I think you are
mistaken".

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thom Brown 2015-03-12 17:05:48 Re: Parallel Seq Scan
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-03-12 16:46:19 Re: pg_dump: CREATE TABLE + CREATE RULE vs. relreplident