| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Arthur Silva <arthurprs(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 64-bit XIDs again |
| Date: | 2015-07-31 19:00:49 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYpAt5r9NN09wRKm=VK0TzR==N13D3_9aeacNAMdsf+Lw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Arthur Silva <arthurprs(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> In the other hand PG tuple overhead is already the largest among the
> alternatives.
> Even if storage keeps getting faster and cheaper stuff you can't ignore the
> overhead of adding yet another 8bytes to each tuple.
+1, very much.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fabrízio de Royes Mello | 2015-07-31 19:12:14 | Re: Doubt about AccessExclusiveLock in ALTER TABLE .. SET ( .. ); |
| Previous Message | Qingqing Zhou | 2015-07-31 18:55:24 | Re: Planner debug views |