Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Date: 2021-06-17 19:20:03
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYoyZta+bUeTxQTUfZOew1vvA7Mi1ECBy93Qe18n363hQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 2:48 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> Or do you mean that looking at the filesystem at all is bypassing shared
> buffers?

This is what I mean. I think we will end up in a better spot if we can
avoid doing that without creating too much ugliness elsewhere.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2021-06-17 19:23:00 Re: Centralizing protective copying of utility statements
Previous Message Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker 2021-06-17 19:15:42 Re: Add version macro to libpq-fe.h