Re: Remove vacuum_defer_cleanup_age

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Remove vacuum_defer_cleanup_age
Date: 2016-10-13 00:00:34
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYo9j19j7_41LapN4vKQ1i4EHYYucHO3zJWskEL2Tv0TQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 9:51 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> Given that hot_standby_feedback is pretty bulletproof now, and a lot of
> the work in reducing replay conflicts, I think the utility of
> vacuum_defer_cleanup_age is at an end. I really meant so submit a patch
> to remove it to 9.6, but it got away from me.
>
> Any objections to removing the option in 10?

I'm not sure I see the point.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-10-13 00:10:20 pgsql: Remove spurious word.
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-10-12 23:58:05 Re: Rename max_parallel_degree?