Re: pg_check_dir comments and implementation mismatch

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Marco Nenciarini <marco(dot)nenciarini(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_check_dir comments and implementation mismatch
Date: 2015-02-23 00:39:37
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYnZUeHenALQZ+iJMcVvsS_A0VpzkGz3hOL=ZMX1FkykQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 12:59 AM, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 03:48:33PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 8:28 AM, Marco Nenciarini <marco(dot)nenciarini(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it> wrote:
>> > I've attached a new version of the patch fixing the missing closedir on
>> > readdir error.
>>
>> If readir() fails and closedir() succeeds, the return will be -1 but
>> errno will be 0.
>
> Out of curiosity, have you seen a closedir() implementation behave that way?
> It would violate C99 ("The value of errno is zero at program startup, but is
> never set to zero by any library function.") and POSIX.

No. Good point, I didn't think about that. I think this way is safer, though.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-02-23 00:53:33 Re: Precedence of standard comparison operators
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2015-02-23 00:35:28 Re: Allow "snapshot too old" error, to prevent bloat