Re: legitimacy of using PG_TRY , PG_CATCH , PG_END_TRY in C function

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, John Lumby <johnlumby(at)hotmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: legitimacy of using PG_TRY , PG_CATCH , PG_END_TRY in C function
Date: 2017-10-26 11:35:25
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYmaW_e3kg4q8Ufg_13tCWCovustQ=2OrFr-oi=ujyeQA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> It'd probably be a good idea to expand on this in the sgml docs. This
> has confused quite anumber of people...

That's a good idea.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2017-10-26 11:37:48 Re: Removing [Merge]Append nodes which contain a single subpath
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-10-26 11:34:02 Re: path toward faster partition pruning