Re: scary patch contest

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: scary patch contest
Date: 2026-08-26 12:06:50
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYm+d+Yimz+LKjZc8TLDtwsL0wUyvWj6Du_RVP93MoOHg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 26, 2026 at 8:01 AM David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I don't have anything to quantify it for the community as a whole, but
> at least for me, I don't think I've ever had fewer free cycles. I
> suspect that's the case for many of us. So I don't think that it's
> unreasonable to set the revert bar a bit lower this year.

That is absolutely true for me as well. Furthermore, I don't really
want to see a bunch of big features get reverted at this late stage,
or at all. On the other hand, shipping an unusually buggy release will
not help one bit with the problem of all of us being short of free
cycles.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matt Blewitt 2026-08-26 12:14:16 Re: [PATCH] Fix JSON_SERIALIZE() coercion placeholder type for jsonb input
Previous Message Ilya Gladyshev 2026-08-26 12:03:02 [PATCH] Remove redundant path_nulls checks in setPathObject/Array