| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgbench doc fix |
| Date: | 2018-10-31 17:49:02 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYjzB9zkVBYaNWpigfyvUOYnPf745tRDvo==HUCdq-BCA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 8:48 AM Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> Yes, you need to send params (thus send bind message) anyway.
> Regarding re-parsing, maybe you mixed up parse-analythis with
> planning? Re-parse-analythis can only be avoided if you can reuse
> named (or unnamed) parepared statements.
So given this, I'm struggling to see anything wrong with the current
wording. I mean, if you say that you are reusing prepared statements,
someone will assume that you are avoiding preparing them repeatedly,
which -M extended will not do ... and by the nature of that approach,
cannot do.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2018-10-31 17:53:12 | Re: Continue work on changes to recovery.conf API |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2018-10-31 17:45:27 | Re: Speeding up INSERTs and UPDATEs to partitioned tables |