Re: Changing the concept of a DATABASE

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Changing the concept of a DATABASE
Date: 2012-05-22 11:56:04
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYjc52BTuqBWBUrG+K+gFkQGBRn9GT7hAWx7G=+rqJ_Og@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 7:35 AM, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org> wrote:
>> * Allow users to access tables in >1 database easily, with appropriate rights.
>
> That one I'm very sceptical about. In the long run, I think we want better
> separation of databases, not less, and this requirement carries a huge risk
> of standing in the way of that. Also, I think that once we integrate the postgres
> FDW into core (that's the plan in the long run, right?), we're going to get
> a good approximation of that essentially for free.

+1.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2012-05-22 11:59:57 Problem with error response message
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2012-05-22 11:47:34 Re: Changing the concept of a DATABASE