| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Copying Permissions |
| Date: | 2016-11-09 21:41:08 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYiU+V7KHVS_BOfVgTfia6v8DaFRs93tWTLfRDnS5Sqpw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> 3. The operation is judged to have succeeded if at least one permission is
> granted, or NO grants failed (i.e. there was nothing to grant).
Allow me to be skeptical. If a user types INSERT INTO blah VALUES
(...), (...), (...) should we change the system to report success if
at least 1 of the 3 rows got successfully inserted? I bet that
wouldn't go over well.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-11-09 21:47:37 | Re: proposal: psql \setfileref |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-11-09 21:34:28 | Re: Specifying the log file name of pgbench -l option |