From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, 曾文旌(义从) <wenjing(dot)zwj(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, 蔡松露(子嘉) <zijia(at)taobao(dot)com>, "Cai, Le" <le(dot)cai(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>, 萧少聪(铁庵) <shaocong(dot)xsc(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables |
Date: | 2020-02-07 17:31:19 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYhGx4Q=4wAKD_ioZQz49kELHrzmLmAWx2fw8ZHRrjt9Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 12:28 PM Konstantin Knizhnik
<k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> But in any case, if we agree that we can control thus behavior using GUC
> or index property,
> then it is ok for me.
Nope, I am not going to agree to that, and I don't believe that any
other committer will, either.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Dilger | 2020-02-07 17:36:36 | Re: Portal->commandTag as an enum |
Previous Message | Konstantin Knizhnik | 2020-02-07 17:31:18 | Re: Global temporary tables |