Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, 曾文旌(义从) <wenjing(dot)zwj(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, 蔡松露(子嘉) <zijia(at)taobao(dot)com>, "Cai, Le" <le(dot)cai(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>, 萧少聪(铁庵) <shaocong(dot)xsc(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables
Date: 2020-02-07 17:31:19
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYhGx4Q=4wAKD_ioZQz49kELHrzmLmAWx2fw8ZHRrjt9Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 12:28 PM Konstantin Knizhnik
<k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> But in any case, if we agree that we can control thus behavior using GUC
> or index property,
> then it is ok for me.

Nope, I am not going to agree to that, and I don't believe that any
other committer will, either.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Dilger 2020-02-07 17:36:36 Re: Portal->commandTag as an enum
Previous Message Konstantin Knizhnik 2020-02-07 17:31:18 Re: Global temporary tables